Now, the AMD FX 600 has been around for a LONG time. It was first introduced in October of 2012 and people wen't nuts. AMD then introduced the 6350 in spring of 2013. The FX series was the go to for budget builds. The more famous FX 6300, its younger brother got most of the fame as there is a small difference between the two, noticeable? Let's find out!
Now the AM3+ Socket is again, a very old socket but there is so much overclocking potential. If you buy an FX processor you SHOULD be overclocking, given how easy it is. One downside of the old socket, and a personal pet peeve is the BIOS. Many BIOS from 2012 look horrible. Blue screens with no mouse support, like really? Although this is mainly just a pet peeve, so try and not let it be a big buying influence. The FX 6350, compared to it's younger brother the FX 6300 is pretty much the same. Only difference is a higher stock clock speed and that extra "50" at the end. Although it has a slightly lower overclock. For an extra 15 dollars, the only person I would see in buying the 6350 OVER the 6300 is if you don't feel comfortable overclocking, and have an extra 15 dollars to spend. Now, enough with the talk, lets see how they perform. I usually just install everything and run the gaming benchmarks, gaming scores usually give a good representation of the graphics card, and not so much the CPU. So here are some quick benchmarks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorHey, Im the writer for Tech Just In, and I love to write and publish reviews on New Tech on the market! Archives
May 2018
|